15 May 2018

Driving in Chicago (well, sort of)


This is a piece I wrote sometime around 2003 when I was working as a project manager for an environmental cleanup project outside of Chicago and losing my mind trying to deal with the many loony personalities in the local community of Oak Park. I had totally forgotten about it until I found it on a storage disk, and it made me laugh to remember everything my colleagues and I had to go through on that awful project. I was playing around with a sort of a Dave Barry writing style back then, so I thought it would be fun to post here.


If you are planning a fun-filled driving tour of a lawless third-world country where all the local drivers are self-taught, licenses and insurance are considered silly frills, lane markings are just suggestions, and the rules of the road are analogous with the rules of the jungle, you might want to consider spending a week in preparation by driving around Chicago.

Although I have experienced the joy of driving on a wide variety of roads and conditions in and around Chicago, most of my daily Chicago driving experiences have actually been in Oak Park, a small, rectangular suburb just west of the city. Chicago area suburbs are required to use some combination of seven words – oak, elm, forest, river, park, hurst, and brook – or else they cannot receive matching funds from the state of Illinois for maintenance of their many fine roads. This is why one avoids driving in Berwyn or Cicero.

“Suburb” is really a misnomer because Oak Park is quite urbanized with many impoverished neighborhoods complete with broken-down cars on the streets, a dynamic criminal element, a flourishing drug trade, and – of course – plenty of traffic. What sets it apart as a suburb, aside from legal incorporation, is the fact that many of its cab drivers speak English, even if only as a second language.

Oak Park is actually two very different places: The north is populated primarily by wealthy white people who own big homes designed by Oak Park’s patron saint, Frank Lloyd Wright. So loved is Frank Lloyd that the local government once sought to officially change its name to Franklloydwrightsville, but then they would have lost all that state money for road repairs and dog parks.

The south is pretty much indistinguishable from Chicago or Berwyn, and most of the people live in small homes designed by Frank Lloyd Wright’s less successful brother, Skippy, who was later found to have suffered from attention deficit disorder and severe nervous twitches in his hands. Oak Park rules require that at least four houses in south Oak Park occupy the equivalent lot size as one house in north Oak Park.

Oak Park was named after its many oak trees and many parks, most of which eventually became the private yards of wealthy people in the north or were paved over to build lovely lower-income housing in the south.  In between the north and the south is a thriving business district – despite the best efforts of the local government – in which there are many expensive condos and town homes populated by Oak Park’s most influential residents: wealthy white homosexuals. 

Oak Park’s town motto is (and we are not making this up) “One tree, many nuts.”

Actually, Oak Park is a village, not a town. This change is believed to have been made shortly after its other patron saint, Hillary Clinton, published her book about taking villages, which I originally thought was a novel about the Vietnam War.  Imagine my surprise. I am still curious to know who actually wrote that book, but not curious enough to waste time reading it.

To say that Oak Park is politically liberal is like revealing that dolphins defecate in the water. Like liberals everywhere, Oak Parkers like to call themselves “progressives” because it fits with their collective superiority complex.

In the finest liberal tradition of trying to control other people’s lives as much as possible, Oak Park likes to regulate everything, and its village council is always very busy making up new rules to force everyone else to conform to their view of the world. On those rare occasions when they can’t think of something to make a new rule about, they amuse themselves instead by sending their bureaucratic minions out to harass restaurants and other businesses, issue parking tickets, or count how many pets residents have.

But the fact is that Oak Park can almost always think of something new to prohibit or require, and they are really very creative about it. For example, by official ordinance, it is illegal to own or carry a nuclear weapon within the village limits (we are not making that up).

It is also illegal to be a Republican or Libertarian, or to listen to conservative talk radio. Oak Park even has a village-sponsored jamming device located somewhere in the public library that is specifically tuned to prevent anyone from getting good reception on WLS-AM, the Chicago radio station that carries many conservative talk shows. I heard that Oak Park attempted once to make Christian prayer illegal, but a “higher power” prevailed in thwarting that attempt. (OK, so some of that might have been made up, but just a little.)

Oak Park prides itself on embracing human diversity (provided none of those diverse humans are conservative or Christian), and this is evidenced by the many black people and many homosexuals who live there. Of course, in Oak Park, you can’t actually say “black” or “homosexual” (you guessed it, they passed an ordinance).  In fact, the president of the village council herself proudly pledges allegiance to a rainbow flag.

Oak Park goes to great lengths to tout its many gay and lesbian residents because they are mostly white and have money. This allows them to claim the diversity mantle and act very superior while obscuring the fact that they really wish that most of the African-American people would stay in Chicago or Berwyn. As it is, most of the black people live in the houses designed by Skippy Wright that are crammed onto the small lots on the south side, while homosexuals generally live in expensive new condo developments near the business district, most of which were happily funded by the village government in order to attract more gays and lesbians with money.

Oak Park is believed to be the first community in the entire nation to be considering an ordinance requiring that all residents be homosexual. They believe this could also help solve the “African-American problem” by encouraging more of them to move to Chicago or Berwyn where they could remain heterosexual.

Although all residents of Oak Park are required to vote either Democrat or Green for federal and state offices, the village has a variety of entertaining political parties for its local elections with names such as the Village Managers Association, the Out Party, and the Village Citizen’s Alliance. But by far, the most popular local party is the Entitlement Party, sometimes known also as the Pity Party. 

The basic philosophy of this party is that they are all victims who are “owed” something by everyone else. In their view, “someone,” such as the federal or state government, corporations, or utility companies, should be forced (by village ordinance, of course) to simply give them stuff. This is because they believe they are entitled the same stuff that anyone else has, but should not be expected to have to actually work and earn it.

Admission to the Entitlement Party is generally open to anyone who is not a heterosexual white male. In some cases, however, heterosexual white males have been allowed to join the party, provided they sign a letter asserting how much they hate themselves for their race, gender, sexual orientation and the terrible treatment their forefathers perpetrated on everyone else.  Considering that Oak Park will probably enact a ban on heterosexual white males soon (unless they are officially registered as househusbands), the admission criteria may become moot.

Because so many of its residents chose academia over actually working for a living and are, therefore, very well educated, Oak Park has two weekly newspapers. One paper is called Oak Leaves and is so thick it has to be bound with staples. The actual news content, however, can be read in approximately five minutes. Oak Leaves is the less popular of the two papers because it is owned by a large corporation that publishes local papers all around Chicagoland. Due to this corporate relationship, it is largely considered to be a pawn of the right wing and ultimately responsible for keeping Guatemalan peasants in forced poverty and depleting the ozone layer.

The other paper, Wednesday Journal, is one of those publications where journalistic integrity is not just a motto, it’s an oxymoron. The Journal’s real motto is “All the News that’s Fit to Slant.” It is edited by an avowed socialist, and its staff is made up of “reporters” who were not good enough to intern for a large Chicago daily or work for the Oak Leaves. At the Journal, they never let facts get in the way of a good piece of left-wing propaganda.

Oak Park has a very entertaining government system with numerous autonomous entities such as the park district board and school district board, which provide opportunities for citizens with no talent and overriding Napoleon complexes to pretend they are actually on the village council making up all those ordinances to control everyone else. 

The park board is especially fun because everyone who gets elected believes that it is a stepping stone to higher elected office such as the sewer commission. No one actually gets on the park board because they have an interest in parks; they just want to pretend that they are the alternate village council and prepare for that big opportunity to move up to controlling sewers. Plus, they feel special when they get to go into “executive session.”

One of the most fun things to do on the park board is to feud with the village council and to say insulting things about village trustees, which will then get printed in one of the local papers, further heightening that board member’s renown in the community and enhancing that person’s opportunity to make it to higher office. Each of Oak Park’s newspapers is aligned with one of the boards; the Oak Leaves tends to side with the village council, while the Wednesday Journal exists largely as the park district board’s “newsletter.”

But I digress. This was supposed to be about driving in Chicago, wasn’t it?

--------------------------------------------------