Cristin Bruggeman is going to be a successful novelist in the
not-too-distant future. Who knows – maybe she’ll even be famous with adoring
fans anxiously awaiting her next work, adapted movies, and the whole nine
yards.
Cristin is my daughter, and her potential to become a great writer
is one thing I like to believe she inherited from dear old dad. But she is way
ahead of her dad in realizing that potential. She is wrapping up rewrites on
her second novel and has interest from at least one publisher. And she already
has an idea about her next project.
Dad, on the other hand, still has little more than “concepts.” If
things continue on their present course, “potential” will be dad’s only claim
to fame.
I’m not going to delve too much into the reasons why so many
years of potential have gone unfulfilled. It’s all in the past anyway; can’t
change that. But it is a source of embarrassment and sadness. For a long time,
I suppose, I was just uninspired, or too busy with other things like working
for a living. I know that there was a time when I decided that I just wasn’t
good enough, so why bother trying?
And for some years closer to the present day, I guess I looked
at all those lost years, reasoned that there just wasn’t much time left, and
figured there was no point in trying if I hadn’t been able to budge myself to
write – really write – for the majority of my adult life. It’s like a lot of
things in recent years: I’ve been in a “it’s almost over anyway, so why
bother?" mode.
That’s a bad mode to be in. It affects everything in your life,
and not in a good way. I thought about that a bit earlier this morning while
looking at my utterly disgusting naked form in a full-length mirror (damned
hotel). But I got over that pretty well after I returned to the miracle of
clothing. Still, I really need to do something about that disgusting naked
form, while there still might be time.
Enter Stephen King
I have never read one of Stephen King’s books. I should slap myself for that. Maybe I was just never interested much in his particular genre of horror-mystery (or mystery-horror… whatever). But he is a self-made master of the novel, and to have not read at least some of his work is a kind of literary heresy.
A few years ago, Cristin gave me one of his books as a birthday
gift – not a novel, but a book he wrote about writing. I was appreciative, and
I took a cursory look through some of the pages. Then it found a place on my
bookshelf to collect dust along with my Russian-language texts and a few other
assorted books that I thought I’d like to read but rarely have found time for.
A couple of months ago I took some small steps toward renewing my interest in writing.
Maybe it was a New Year resolution thing (I don’t really remember) or maybe it
was the encouragement of a friend and a feeling that I’d like to reward that
encouragement with some real effort – finally. I took a serious look at my old
story ideas that had been collecting virtual mold and even came up with a few
new ones. After doing a little survey, I settled on one to start.
But my first foot forward was still not finding solid ground. I
pumped out an opening scene and then went blank, a victim of my own writer’s
block, work demands, and the lure of the Internet. As I wrote in a recent blog
post about writing, I was still finding it very hard to get myself moving with
the requisite sense of urgency.
About a month ago, I took that Stephen King book off the shelf and
started reading. The first half of the book was a partial autobiography of
King’s early years. It was interesting, but not riveting. I made slow progress
with the book. But the second half has hooked me.
In the second half, King gives so much great information and
advice about writing that I’ve been almost stunned. I only have a bit left to
read, and I’ll probably finish it before I depart Frankfurt for Denver (I am
flying to Frankfurt now). As I’ve been taking in all of King’s ideas and sage
advice, I’ve resolved to do three things: 1) boil it all down to a bullet list
of the things I need to put into action and keep in mind as I write, 2) create
an effective writing space once I return to Kharkiv, and 3) decide who my
“Ideal Reader” is.
The Advice
He also showed me a lot about story vs. plot and how one can get
so focused on outlining a plot and sketching characters that the real story
gets lost. And he gives a great formula and some practical rules for doing the
first draft and then the second. He talks about writing the first draft quickly
with the “door closed,” letting it stew for a month or two, and then going to
the second draft with the door open. Great advice.
King introduced me to the idea of the “Ideal Reader,” one
particular person for whom you sort of unconsciously write the story. The Ideal
Reader is the first person to read the draft when it’s ready and the one you
trust most to give you the kind of feedback that helps you to make effective
corrections. I think I know who my Ideal Reader is, but I have to stew on that
a bit.
Anyway, Stephen King’s advice has come to me at just the right
moment, a moment when I’m getting more serious about my writing than at any
point in my life. It’s true that I’ve let way too much time go to waste, and
there’s no telling how much time I have left, but hell, I could have been hit
by a pineapple cart when I was 27. So who can say really how much time any of
us has. Might was well get busy.
So, I am very thankful to Stephen King. And in gratitude, I fully
intend to start reading his work as soon as I can download a few of them to my
Kindle.
And I am especially thankful to – and proud of – my prodigal daughter, Cristin. Maybe someday, if I work hard and apply myself, dad can walk in his daughter’s footsteps.
And I am especially thankful to – and proud of – my prodigal daughter, Cristin. Maybe someday, if I work hard and apply myself, dad can walk in his daughter’s footsteps.
-------------------------------------------
Side Note: For those who think I might be siding with a "liberal loon" for displaying my appreciation for Stephen King's talents, I want to be clear that while his political views are almost 180-out from mine, that has nothing to do whatsoever with his mastery of the writing craft. He and I would argue until the cows come home about politics, but that has nothing at all to do with the craft of storytelling in print. We shouldn't refuse to acknowledge genius just because we don't like the person's political views.
No comments:
Post a Comment